Represented a state agency in suit brought by insurer alleging constitutional violations in ratemaking decisions

Represented a state agency in a suit brought by an insurer alleging constitutional violations with respect to insurance ratemaking decisions. The case is significant because it addresses the immediate appealability of a discovery ruling on qualified immunity, the requisites for qualified immunity, absolute legislative immunity, and the requisites of asserting a §1983 suit alleging the violation of the Takings Clause. The case was won on a dispositive motion.